Some Definitions

I don’t agree with every jot and tittle here but these definitions are damn sight more insightful than Merriam Webster’s.

FREE MARKET: That condition of society in which all economic transactions result from voluntary choice without coercion.

THE STATE: That institution which interferes with the Free Market through the direct exercise of coercion or the granting of privileges (backed by coercion).

TAX: That form of coercion or interference with the Free Market in which the State collects tribute (the tax), allowing it to hire armed forces to practice coercion in defense of privilege, and also to engage in such wars, adventures, experiments, “reforms”, etc., as it pleases, not at its own cost, but at the cost of “its” subjects.

PRIVILEGE: From the Latin privi, private, and lege, law. An advantage granted by the State and protected by its powers of coercion. A law for private benefit.

USURY: That form of privilege or interference with the Free Market in which one State-supported group monopolizes the coinage and thereby takes tribute (interest), direct or indirect, on all or most economic transactions.

LANDLORDISM: That form of privilege or interference with the Free Market in which one State-supported group “owns” the land and thereby takes tribute (rent) from those who live, work, or produce on the land.

TARRIFF: That form of privilege or interference with the Free Market in which commodities produced outside the State are not allowed to compete equally with those produced inside the State.

CAPITALISM: That organization of society, incorporating elements of tax, usury, landlordism, and tariff, which thus denies the Free Market while pretending to exemplify it.

CONSERVATISM: That school of capitalist philosophy which claims allegiance to the Free Market while actually supporting usury, landlordism, tariff, and sometimes taxation.

LIBERALISM: That school of capitalist philosophy which attempts to correct the injustices of capitalism by adding new laws to the existing laws. Each time conservatives pass a law creating privilege, liberals pass another law modifying privilege, leading conservatives to pass a more subtle law recreating privilege, etc., until “everything not forbidden is compulsory” and “everything not compulsory is forbidden”.

SOCIALISM: The attempted abolition of all privilege by restoring power entirely to the coercive agent behind privilege, the State, thereby converting capitalist oligarchy into Statist monopoly. Whitewashing a wall by painting it black.

ANARCHISM: That organization of society in which the Free Market operates freely, without taxes, usury, landlordism, tariffs, or other forms of coercion or privilege. “Right” anarchists predict that in the Free Market people would voluntarily choose to compete more often than to cooperate; “left” anarchists predict that in the Free Market people would voluntarily choose to cooperate more often than to compete.

Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson, The Illuminatus! Trilogy

Capitalism and Sexual Repression — Yes, Repression!


Photo credit: mzacha from morguefile.com

First, a note on the distinction between the system of capitalism and the free market. The two are not the same although state capitalist elites and their propagandists would like you to believe so. A key difference is that markets spontaneously develop without the need for a state or any centralized authority. On the other hand, big capitalists have always tended to have a symbiotic relationship (at the very least) with government bureaucracy. The capitalist system that exists in the world today could never have come into being were it not for state power. Such capitalists don’t really want a free market and never did. Why would they? Among other things, the freer the market, the more real competition they have to deal with! The capitalist elites could hardly maintain their cartels without using governments to limit competition and stifle potential competitors. When Sovereignists critique capitalism, this shouldn’t be misconstrued as a condemnation of free markets. Genuine economic freedom is antithetical to the capitalist system.

Some forms of sexual repression tend to benefit corporate capitalists. Wait, “sex sells” does it not? Of course it does! But that’s exactly why big business benefits from societal schizophrenia around sex. Consider someone who has sex only occasionally, and even then the sex is rushed. Then consider someone who has sex at least once a day and the sex is anything but rushed. Which one is more likely to be enticed by a sexy ad enough to buy the product? Which one is more likely to consider the flash of a bare breast to be any big deal? Which one is more likely to secretly and compulsively buy pornography? Well, yes, the one for whom real sex is rushed and rare! This is an example of how capitalists can so easily benefit from sexual repression. Such repression most often is not as straightforward as in places like Saudi Arabia, but is more along the lines of a sexual schizophrenia which profits from tantalizing with appetizers but ever keeping the main course just out of reach. It should then be no surprise that commercial porn sites tend to find their most reliably compulsive customers in some of the most sexually repressed reaches of the world.

Someone with a harem of living, breathing, human sex dolls at home likely wouldn’t be easily captivated by sexually suggestive ads or quick to shell out money for plastic “love.” Likewise, someone frequently visited by beautiful young demimondaines probably isn’t going to spend much money on phone sex. Why pay money for experiences far less intense than one is already enjoying? Corporate products and services tend to offer stimulation that is shallow and brief – that is, just enough stimulation for someone to want to buy more. And more. And more. In contrast, stimulation of great depth and duration tends to hit just the right spot, and I don’t mean the button for compulsively flipping to the next porn channel. I mean it brings on a level of lasting intensity of feeling which is incompatible with a compulsion to move on and splurge on a quick fix.

Sexuality has amazing potential, especially if one moves beyond compulsive quickies and vicarious tantalizers to very intense experiences. This threatens the capitalist system because it’s something that people could ultimately do without the need for centralized industrial mass production or the involvement of corporate cartels. Who is going to pay and pay and pay for gimmicks like supposedly cathartic pornography (but “don’t try this at home, amateurs!”), plastic dolls or ‘virtual reality’ when far more intense and authentic experiences are readily available in reality? As markets ultimately eclipse the rotting husk of the state, people will be able to win more and more effective options to enrich their own lives, rather than enrich the profit-obsessed elites of a state capitalist system. A truly sovereign sexuality will be integral to this transformation.


Photo credit: mzacha from morguefile.com